Response Details

Response Details
From A.C Gunner
Date Started: 06 Nov 2017 13:16. Last modified: 06 Nov 2017 13:16
Status Complete
Response ID #576534

I.

Do you wish to be notified when the recommendations of the person appointed to carry out an independent examination of the Local Plan Part 1 have been published?

You must provide an answer to this question.

  • Yes
  • No

II.

Do you wish to be notified when the Local Plan Part 1 has been adopted?

You must provide an answer to this question.

  • Yes
  • No

III.

Does your representation relate to Addendum to the Sustainability Appraisal?

 

  • Yes
  • No

IV.

Please add any comments in relation to the Addendum to Sustainability Appraisal of the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 in the box below.

«No response»

V.

Does your representation relate to Addendum to the Habitats Regulations Assessment?

  • Yes
  • No

VI.

Please add any comments in relation to the Addendum to the Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Waverley Local Plan Part 1 in the box below.

«No response»

1a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

1b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

6.24

1c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

1d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

1e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

1f.

If you consider the Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

The FNP received overwhelming public support in the May 2017 Referendum when 88 percent of Farnham residents voted in favour that it should be used to decide planning applications and where new housing should be located.

The Plan was challenged by developers in the High Court and thoroughly examined by the Planning Inspectorate and found to be valid in both instances.
The FNP was subsequently ADOPTED by WBC on 28 JULY 2017.

The decision by WBC to revisit the FNP could render it out of date within months of adoption and once again open the door for profiteering developers to seek to dictate planning policy.
Any additional housing requirement in the Farnham area should be included in the FNP review in five years time which will also allow time for suitable new sites to be identified.

To discard the FNP in such a derisory fashion brings nothing but discredit on WBC and should not be permitted.

1g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

2a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

2b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

2c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

2d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

2e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

2f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

2g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

3a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

3b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

3c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

3d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

3e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

3f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

3g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

4a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

4b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

4c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

4d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

4e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

4f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

4g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

5a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

5b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

5c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

5d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

5e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

5f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

5g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

6a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

6b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

6c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

6d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

6e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

6f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

6g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

7a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

7b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

7c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

7d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

7e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

7f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

7g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

8a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

8b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

8c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

8d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

8e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

8f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

8g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

9a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

9b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

9c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

9d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

9e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

9f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

9g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

10a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

10b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

10c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

10d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

10e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

10f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

10g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

11a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

11b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

11c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

11d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

11e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

11f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

11g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

12a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

12b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

12c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

12d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

12e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

12f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

12g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

13a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

13b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

13c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

13d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

13e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

13f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

13g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

14a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

14b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

14c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

14d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

14e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

14f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

14g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

15a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

15b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

15c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

15d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

15e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

15f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

15g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

16a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

16b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

16c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

16d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

16e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

16f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

16g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

17a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

17b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

17c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

17d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

17e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

17f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

17g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

18a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

18b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

18c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

18d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

18e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

18f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

18g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

19a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

19b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

19c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

19d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

19e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

19f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

19g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

20a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

20b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

20c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

20d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

20e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

20f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

20g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

21a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

21b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

21c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

21d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

21e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

21f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

21g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

22a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

22b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

22c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

22d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

22e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

22f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

22g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

23a.

Does your representation relate to this modification?

  • Yes
  • No

23b.

Please provide the representation policy reference or paragraph number in the box below.

«No response»

23c.

Do you consider this modification to be legally compliant?

  • Yes
  • No

23d.

Do you consider this modification to be sound?

  • Yes
  • No

23e.

If you consider this Main Modification to the Local Plan Part 1 to be unsound, is it because it is not (select as appropriate):

  • Positively Prepared?
  • Justified?
  • Effective?
  • Consistent with National Policy?

23f.

If you consider this Main Modification to be unsound or not legally compliant, please provide details why. Please be as precise as possible. If you wish to support the legal compliance or soundness of the Main Modification, please also use this box.

«No response»

23g.

Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound, having regard to the matter you have identified in the question above where this related to soundness. You will need to say why this change will make the Main Modification legally compliant or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested or revised wording. Please be as precise as possible.

«No response»

Accompanying Documents.

Please provide any additional documents or images to accompany your comments. Please indicate which Main Modification(s) your additional documents relate to.  

You can upload up to 10 files.

«No files»